Difference between revisions of "RS Oph paper meetings"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{Date|2022-03-09}} | {{Date|2022-03-09}} | ||
* Discussion | * Discussion | ||
| − | - Runs in dark conditions present similar pixel charge distribution. We exclude the ones with runs affected by moon or strange distribution. | + | :- Runs in dark conditions present similar pixel charge distribution. We exclude the ones with runs affected by moon or strange distribution. |
* Presented | * Presented | ||
| − | - First results using the IRFs computed by lstmcpipe. | + | :- First results using the IRFs computed by lstmcpipe. |
| − | - First result analysis RS Oph with Fermi data | + | :- First result analysis RS Oph with Fermi data |
* To be done: | * To be done: | ||
| − | - Several checks on Crab, using 3 different datasets: 20201120, September 2021 and March 2022. | + | :- Several checks on Crab, using 3 different datasets: 20201120, September 2021 and March 2022. |
| − | - Compare sensitivity plots | + | :- Compare sensitivity plots |
{{Date|2022-03-30}} | {{Date|2022-03-30}} | ||
Revision as of 18:24, 10 March 2022
2022-02-09
Kick off meeting, division of the work. We decided that we should To be done: LST analysis, Fermi analysis, we decided not to go for optical analysis => will use the data that will be published by MAGIC
2022-02-23
To be done: LST analysis
2022-03-09
- Discussion
- - Runs in dark conditions present similar pixel charge distribution. We exclude the ones with runs affected by moon or strange distribution.
- Presented
- - First results using the IRFs computed by lstmcpipe.
- - First result analysis RS Oph with Fermi data
- To be done:
- - Several checks on Crab, using 3 different datasets: 20201120, September 2021 and March 2022.
- - Compare sensitivity plots
2022-03-30
