Difference between revisions of "GRB221009A src-ind analysis dark conditions"
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
=Dark analysis= | =Dark analysis= | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
The MC production for the Crab is used because the NSB tuning parameters at the DL1 level are very similar between them: | The MC production for the Crab is used because the NSB tuning parameters at the DL1 level are very similar between them: | ||
Line 55: | Line 50: | ||
"extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 2.25 | "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 2.25 | ||
} | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Monte Carlo information== | ||
+ | * Link to MC files used: /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/* | ||
+ | ** Particle types: The standard ones for the AllSky MC production. | ||
+ | ** DEC Band (deg): dec_2276 | ||
==DL1 data== | ==DL1 data== | ||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
**fixed_theta_cut: 0.2 (standard cut) | **fixed_theta_cut: 0.2 (standard cut) | ||
+ | == Theta2 plot == | ||
==Crab check== | ==Crab check== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The following Crab runs are used for the crab check: November 21 and 23 2022; 10914-8 and 10986-9. These runs are chosen because they were taken in similar atmospheric conditions and similar zenith and azimuth values. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Crab data is processed with the same analysis specifications as the GRB221009A runs in dark conditions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Quality cuts in gammaness and theta | ||
+ | : Efficiency cuts in gammaness and theta are used. In particular, three gammaness efficiency values and one theta efficiency are used. The value of the theta efficiency is set to 70% following the performance paper. A higher value is not chosen to avoid reducing the signal-to-noise (since the first run in dark conditions started 5 days after outburst). | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Combinations: | ||
+ | ::* geff = 0.5 and teff 0.7 | ||
+ | ::* geff = 0.7 and teff 0.7 | ||
+ | ::* geff = 0.9 and teff 0.7 | ||
+ | |||
+ | The IRFs are produced using Chaitanyia's branch with the nearest node option. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The energy threshold for Crab runs: | ||
+ | The energy threshold is obtained using the closest node to the middle of the Crab runs distribution in cos(ZD)-sin(delta) plane. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div><ul> | ||
+ | <li style="display: inline-block;"> [[File:Ethd-Crab-GRB221009A.png|thumb|none|350px|MC true energy distribution to obtain the energy threshold.]] </li> | ||
+ | </ul></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Spectral energy distribution: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The spectral energy distributions for the different cuts in gammaness and theta efficiency cuts show a discrepancy below 100 GeV. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div><ul> | ||
+ | <li style="display: inline-block;"> [[File:SED-Crab-geff0.5-teff0.7-ethd0.05.png|thumb|none|350px|SED using Crab runs with geff = 0.5 and teff 0.7. Lower energy bound for the fitting at E=50 GeV.]] </li> | ||
+ | <li style="display: inline-block;"> [[File:SED-Crab-geff0.7-teff0.7-ethd0.05.png|thumb|none|350px|SED using Crab runs with geff = 0.7 and teff 0.7. Lower energy bound for the fitting at E=50 GeV.]] </li> | ||
+ | <li style="display: inline-block;"> [[File:SED-Crab-geff0.9-teff0.7-ethd0.05.png|thumb|none|350px|SED using Crab runs with geff = 0.9 and teff 0.7. Lower energy bound for the fitting at E=50 GeV.]] </li> | ||
+ | </ul></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thus, the energy threshold is increased to 100 GeV. The resulting SED is the following: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div><ul> | ||
+ | <li style="display: inline-block;"> [[File:SED-Crab-ethd0.1.png|thumb|none|350px|SED using Crab runs with geff = 0.5 and teff 0.7 (blue), geff = 0.7 and teff 0.7 (orange) and geff = 0.9 and teff 0.7 (green). Lower energy bound for the fitting at E=100 GeV.]] </li> | ||
+ | </ul></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The results are very similar between analyses. I decide to use the gammaness efficiency cut of 50% and a efficiency cut in theta of 70%. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 131: | Line 178: | ||
=Mild moon analysis= | =Mild moon analysis= | ||
+ | |||
+ | Due to the mild moon condition, the runs 9629 and 9630 show different NSB. Thus, the image cleaning may change w.r.t. the standard picture and boundary threshold. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * NSB | ||
+ | |||
+ | NSB tuning parameters for run_id = 9629: | ||
+ | { | ||
+ | "number_of_files_used": 16, | ||
+ | "std": [ | ||
+ | 0.392, | ||
+ | 0.141, | ||
+ | 0.548 | ||
+ | ] | ||
+ | }{ | ||
+ | "increase_nsb": true, | ||
+ | "extra_noise_in_dim_pixels": 3.145, | ||
+ | "extra_bias_in_dim_pixels": 0.957, | ||
+ | "transition_charge": 8, | ||
+ | "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 3.995 | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | NSB tuning parameters for run_id = 9630: | ||
+ | { | ||
+ | "number_of_files_used": 8, | ||
+ | "std": [ | ||
+ | 1.176, | ||
+ | 0.276, | ||
+ | 1.816 | ||
+ | ] | ||
+ | }{ | ||
+ | "increase_nsb": true, | ||
+ | "extra_noise_in_dim_pixels": 6.426, | ||
+ | "extra_bias_in_dim_pixels": 1.656, | ||
+ | "transition_charge": 8, | ||
+ | "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 8.776 | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can see that the NSB parameters values for 9629 and 9630 are x2 and x3 higher than the ones used for the dark conditions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Image cleaning | ||
+ | |||
+ | The picture threshold value is computed based on the condition that this value satisfies that only about 4% of the pedestal pixels will raise their picture thresholds due to the pedestal std dev condition, and not more than 5% pedestals survive the cleaning | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div><ul> | ||
+ | <li style="display: inline-block;"> [[File:picture-thd-9629.png|thumb|none|500px|Picture value distribution (left) and its CDF (right) for run_id=9629. Vertical black line delimiters the 4% condition to set the picture threshold.]] </li> | ||
+ | <li style="display: inline-block;"> [[File:picture-thd-9630.png|thumb|none|500px|Picture value distribution (left) and its CDF (right) for run_id=9630. Vertical black line delimiters the 4% condition to set the picture threshold.]] </li> | ||
+ | </ul></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The picture threshold for run 9629 and 9630 is approximately 8 and 14, respectively. The boundary threshold value is set as half the picture threshold value. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Analysis approach | ||
+ | |||
+ | In order to reduce the computational cost of the analysis for just two runs. I decided to make a MC production for 9630, but only tune the testing MC gammas for 9629 and produce an IRFs with those MC files. Thus, the MC production 20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned is used for the 9629 run. | ||
==Monte Carlo information== | ==Monte Carlo information== | ||
− | * Link to MC files used: /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221215_v0.9.12_base_prod/* | + | * Link to MC files used: /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/* and /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221215_v0.9.12_base_prod/* |
** Particle types: The standard ones for the AllSky MC production. | ** Particle types: The standard ones for the AllSky MC production. | ||
** DEC Band (deg): dec_2276 | ** DEC Band (deg): dec_2276 | ||
Line 139: | Line 239: | ||
==DL1 data== | ==DL1 data== | ||
− | + | Reprocessing of the real DL1a data was required, only NSB tuning was added to the MC files. DL1a files produced by LSTOSA (lstchain v0.9.6?) and lstMCpipe (lstMCpipe v0.9.0 and lstMCpipe v0.10; using lstchain v0.9.9). | |
* original DL1a files | * original DL1a files | ||
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221010/v0.9/tailcut84/dl1_LST-1.Run0XXXX.XXXX.h5 | /fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221010/v0.9/tailcut84/dl1_LST-1.Run0XXXX.XXXX.h5 | ||
+ | /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/ | ||
/fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_base_prod/ | /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_base_prod/ | ||
* lstchain v0.9.9 | * lstchain v0.9.9 | ||
− | * real data: tailcut8-4 (with cleaning based on pedestal RMS), dynamic cleaning. | + | * real data 9629: tailcut8-4 (with cleaning based on pedestal RMS), dynamic cleaning. |
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221015/v0.9/tailcut84/log/lstchain_config_v0.9.4_from2022onwards.json | /fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221015/v0.9/tailcut84/log/lstchain_config_v0.9.4_from2022onwards.json | ||
Line 153: | Line 254: | ||
* lstMCpipe-v0.9.0 | * lstMCpipe-v0.9.0 | ||
* lstchain v0.9.9 | * lstchain v0.9.9 | ||
− | * MC: tailcut8-4, dynamic cleaning, NSB tuning | + | * MC training: tailcut8-4, dynamic cleaning, NSB tuning |
+ | "image_modifier": { | ||
+ | "increase_nsb": true, | ||
+ | "extra_noise_in_dim_pixels": 1.62, | ||
+ | "extra_bias_in_dim_pixels": 0.655, | ||
+ | "transition_charge": 8, | ||
+ | "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 2.08, | ||
+ | "increase_psf": false, | ||
+ | "smeared_light_fraction": 0 | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | : Config file: https://github.com/cta-observatory/lstmcpipe/blob/master/production_configs/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/lstchain_config_2022-10-27.json | ||
+ | |||
+ | * MC testing: tailcut8-4, dynamic cleaning, NSB tuning | ||
"image_modifier": { | "image_modifier": { | ||
"increase_nsb": true, | "increase_nsb": true, | ||
Line 160: | Line 273: | ||
"transition_charge": 8, | "transition_charge": 8, | ||
"extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 2.08, | "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 2.08, | ||
+ | "increase_psf": false, | ||
+ | "smeared_light_fraction": 0 | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | : Config file: /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/scripts/_configs/GRB221009A/lstchain_MC_config_lstchain_belong_v0.9.9_NSBDL1to9629.json | ||
+ | |||
+ | * real data 9630: tailcut14-7 (with cleaning based on pedestal RMS), dynamic cleaning. | ||
+ | |||
+ | /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/scripts/_configs/GRB221009A/real_config_lstchain_belong_v0.9.9_tailcut147_9630.json | ||
+ | |||
+ | * lstchain v0.9.9 | ||
+ | * MC: tailcut14-7, dynamic cleaning, NSB tuning | ||
+ | "image_modifier": { | ||
+ | "increase_nsb": true, | ||
+ | "extra_noise_in_dim_pixels": 6.426, | ||
+ | "extra_bias_in_dim_pixels": 1.656, | ||
+ | "transition_charge": 8, | ||
+ | "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 8.776 | ||
"increase_psf": false, | "increase_psf": false, | ||
"smeared_light_fraction": 0 | "smeared_light_fraction": 0 | ||
}, | }, | ||
− | : Config file | + | : Config file: /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/scripts/_configs/GRB221009A/lstchain_MC_config_lstchain_belong_v0.9.9_tailcut147_NSBDL1to9630.json |
==Random forest== | ==Random forest== | ||
Line 172: | Line 302: | ||
* lstchain-v0.9.9 | * lstchain-v0.9.9 | ||
− | * lstMCpipe-v0.9.0 | + | * lstMCpipe-v0.9.0 (for run 9629) and lstMCpipe-v0.9.0 (for run 9630) |
* source-indep (the standard one for the AllSky MC production) | * source-indep (the standard one for the AllSky MC production) | ||
/fefs/aswg/data/models/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/dec_2276/ | /fefs/aswg/data/models/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/dec_2276/ | ||
+ | /fefs/aswg/workspace/MC_data_simlink/models/AllSky/20230123_GRB221009A_moon_mild_ph/dec_2276/ | ||
+ | |||
==DL2 data== | ==DL2 data== | ||
Line 183: | Line 315: | ||
* source-indep | * source-indep | ||
/fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL2/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/TestingDataset/dec_2276/node_theta_* | /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL2/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/TestingDataset/dec_2276/node_theta_* | ||
− | /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/Analysis/results/real/DL2/ | + | /fefs/aswg/workspace/MC_data_simlink/DL2/AllSky/20230123_GRB221009A_moon_mild_ph/TestingDataset/dec_2276/node_theta_* |
+ | /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/Analysis/results/real/DL2/20221015/srcind/v0.9.9/tailcut84_dynclg_tNSBtoCrabPerfPaper/AllSky_20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned_dec_2276/dl2_* | ||
+ | /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/Analysis/results/real/DL2/20221015/srcind/v0.9.9/tailcut147_dynclg_tNSBmildMoon9630/AllSky_20230123_GRB221009A_moon_mild_ph_dec_2276/dl2_* | ||
* config file | * config file | ||
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221015/v0.9/tailcut84/log/lstchain_config_v0.9.4_from2022onwards.json | /fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221015/v0.9/tailcut84/log/lstchain_config_v0.9.4_from2022onwards.json | ||
+ | /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/scripts/_configs/GRB221009A/real_config_lstchain_belong_v0.9.9_tailcut147_9630.json | ||
+ | /fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221015/v0.9/tailcut84/log/lstchain_config_v0.9.4_from2022onwards.json | ||
+ | /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/scripts/_configs/GRB221009A/lstchain_MC_config_lstchain_belong_v0.9.9_NSBDL1to9629.json | ||
==DL2 data selection to produce theta2 plots== | ==DL2 data selection to produce theta2 plots== | ||
Line 203: | Line 340: | ||
**fixed_theta_cut: 0.2 (standard cut) | **fixed_theta_cut: 0.2 (standard cut) | ||
− | ==Analysis Results | + | == Theta2 plot == |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | =Analysis Results= | ||
Please place higher-level analysis results (Spectra, SkyMaps, Lightcurves, etc) here. | Please place higher-level analysis results (Spectra, SkyMaps, Lightcurves, etc) here. | ||
− | + | == Theta2 plot == | |
− | + | == Significance map == | |
− | + | == Excess map == | |
− | + | == Spectral results == |
Revision as of 13:42, 3 March 2023
Back to the Data analysis page
Go back to Transient Working Group.
Go Back to Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs).
Go back to GRB221009A.
- Analysis by A. Aguasca-Cabot (Universitat de Barcelona - arnau.aguasca@fqa.ub.edu)
General information
This wiki web page shows the analysis of GRB221009A data recorded in dark conditions (run_id: 9625-9960) and in mild moon conditions (run_id: 9629 and 9630) using the source-independent analysis.
For the analysis of GRB221009A for runs in moon conditions go to the following page: GRB221009A_src-ind_analysis_moon
The wiki page with the summary of the current results of the src-ind moon analysis (as of February 8th) for the discussion with LST-Reco conveners is the following: [1]
- Slides presented at the GRB221009A meetings about the source-independent dark/mild-moon analysis:
- Start and Dark analysis I
- Dark analysis II
- Dark analysis III
- Dark analysis IV and mild moon
- Dark analysis V and mild moon
Dark analysis
The MC production for the Crab is used because the NSB tuning parameters at the DL1 level are very similar between them:
DL1 parameters obtained from GRB221009A runs (the NSB tuning parameters for the Crab can be found in the following subsection):
Runs: 9672, 9802, 9862 and 9890 { "number_of_files_used": 46, "std": [ 0.181, 0.077, 0.209 ] }{ "increase_nsb": true, "extra_noise_in_dim_pixels": 1.782, "extra_bias_in_dim_pixels": 0.601, "transition_charge": 8, "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 2.25 }
Monte Carlo information
- Link to MC files used: /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/*
- Particle types: The standard ones for the AllSky MC production.
- DEC Band (deg): dec_2276
DL1 data
No reprocessing of the real DL1a data was required, only NSB tuning was added to the MC files. DL1a files produced by LSTOSA (lstchain v0.9.6?) and lstMCpipe (lstMCpipe v0.9.0 using lstchain v0.9.9).
- original DL1a files
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221010/v0.9/tailcut84/dl1_LST-1.Run0XXXX.XXXX.h5 /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_base_prod/
- lstchain v0.9.9
- real data: tailcut8-4 (with cleaning based on pedestal RMS), dynamic cleaning.
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221015/v0.9/tailcut84/log/lstchain_config_v0.9.4_from2022onwards.json
- lstMCpipe-v0.9.0
- lstchain v0.9.9
- MC: tailcut8-4, dynamic cleaning, NSB tuning
"image_modifier": { "increase_nsb": true, "extra_noise_in_dim_pixels": 1.62, "extra_bias_in_dim_pixels": 0.655, "transition_charge": 8, "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 2.08, "increase_psf": false, "smeared_light_fraction": 0 },
Random forest
RFs were produced with lstMCpipe
- lstchain-v0.9.9
- lstMCpipe-v0.9.0
- source-indep (the standard one for the AllSky MC production)
/fefs/aswg/data/models/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/dec_2276/
DL2 data
- lstchain-v0.9.9
- source-indep
/fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL2/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/TestingDataset/dec_2276/node_theta_* /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/Analysis/results/real/DL2/202210*/srcind/v0.9.9/tailcut84_dynclg_tNSBtoCrabPerfPaper/AllSky_20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned_dec_2276/dl2_*
- config file
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221015/v0.9/tailcut84/log/lstchain_config_v0.9.4_from2022onwards.json
DL2 data selection to produce theta2 plots
Information about the quality cuts to produce the theta2 plots.
Example
- intensity > 50
- r: [0, 1 ]
- wl: [0.01, 1 ]
- leakage_intensity_width_2: [0, 0.2 ]
- event_type: [32, 32]
- source-indep
- fixed_gh_cut: 0.7 (standard cut)
- fixed_theta_cut: 0.2 (standard cut)
Theta2 plot
Crab check
The following Crab runs are used for the crab check: November 21 and 23 2022; 10914-8 and 10986-9. These runs are chosen because they were taken in similar atmospheric conditions and similar zenith and azimuth values.
Crab data is processed with the same analysis specifications as the GRB221009A runs in dark conditions.
- Quality cuts in gammaness and theta
- Efficiency cuts in gammaness and theta are used. In particular, three gammaness efficiency values and one theta efficiency are used. The value of the theta efficiency is set to 70% following the performance paper. A higher value is not chosen to avoid reducing the signal-to-noise (since the first run in dark conditions started 5 days after outburst).
- Combinations:
- geff = 0.5 and teff 0.7
- geff = 0.7 and teff 0.7
- geff = 0.9 and teff 0.7
The IRFs are produced using Chaitanyia's branch with the nearest node option.
- The energy threshold for Crab runs:
The energy threshold is obtained using the closest node to the middle of the Crab runs distribution in cos(ZD)-sin(delta) plane.
- Spectral energy distribution:
The spectral energy distributions for the different cuts in gammaness and theta efficiency cuts show a discrepancy below 100 GeV.
Thus, the energy threshold is increased to 100 GeV. The resulting SED is the following:
The results are very similar between analyses. I decide to use the gammaness efficiency cut of 50% and a efficiency cut in theta of 70%.
Mild moon analysis
Due to the mild moon condition, the runs 9629 and 9630 show different NSB. Thus, the image cleaning may change w.r.t. the standard picture and boundary threshold.
- NSB
NSB tuning parameters for run_id = 9629:
{ "number_of_files_used": 16, "std": [ 0.392, 0.141, 0.548 ] }{ "increase_nsb": true, "extra_noise_in_dim_pixels": 3.145, "extra_bias_in_dim_pixels": 0.957, "transition_charge": 8, "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 3.995 }
NSB tuning parameters for run_id = 9630:
{ "number_of_files_used": 8, "std": [ 1.176, 0.276, 1.816 ] }{ "increase_nsb": true, "extra_noise_in_dim_pixels": 6.426, "extra_bias_in_dim_pixels": 1.656, "transition_charge": 8, "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 8.776 }
We can see that the NSB parameters values for 9629 and 9630 are x2 and x3 higher than the ones used for the dark conditions.
- Image cleaning
The picture threshold value is computed based on the condition that this value satisfies that only about 4% of the pedestal pixels will raise their picture thresholds due to the pedestal std dev condition, and not more than 5% pedestals survive the cleaning
The picture threshold for run 9629 and 9630 is approximately 8 and 14, respectively. The boundary threshold value is set as half the picture threshold value.
- Analysis approach
In order to reduce the computational cost of the analysis for just two runs. I decided to make a MC production for 9630, but only tune the testing MC gammas for 9629 and produce an IRFs with those MC files. Thus, the MC production 20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned is used for the 9629 run.
Monte Carlo information
- Link to MC files used: /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/* and /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221215_v0.9.12_base_prod/*
- Particle types: The standard ones for the AllSky MC production.
- DEC Band (deg): dec_2276
DL1 data
Reprocessing of the real DL1a data was required, only NSB tuning was added to the MC files. DL1a files produced by LSTOSA (lstchain v0.9.6?) and lstMCpipe (lstMCpipe v0.9.0 and lstMCpipe v0.10; using lstchain v0.9.9).
- original DL1a files
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221010/v0.9/tailcut84/dl1_LST-1.Run0XXXX.XXXX.h5 /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/ /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_base_prod/
- lstchain v0.9.9
- real data 9629: tailcut8-4 (with cleaning based on pedestal RMS), dynamic cleaning.
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221015/v0.9/tailcut84/log/lstchain_config_v0.9.4_from2022onwards.json
- lstMCpipe-v0.9.0
- lstchain v0.9.9
- MC training: tailcut8-4, dynamic cleaning, NSB tuning
"image_modifier": { "increase_nsb": true, "extra_noise_in_dim_pixels": 1.62, "extra_bias_in_dim_pixels": 0.655, "transition_charge": 8, "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 2.08, "increase_psf": false, "smeared_light_fraction": 0 },
- MC testing: tailcut8-4, dynamic cleaning, NSB tuning
"image_modifier": { "increase_nsb": true, "extra_noise_in_dim_pixels": 1.62, "extra_bias_in_dim_pixels": 0.655, "transition_charge": 8, "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 2.08, "increase_psf": false, "smeared_light_fraction": 0 },
- Config file: /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/scripts/_configs/GRB221009A/lstchain_MC_config_lstchain_belong_v0.9.9_NSBDL1to9629.json
- real data 9630: tailcut14-7 (with cleaning based on pedestal RMS), dynamic cleaning.
/fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/scripts/_configs/GRB221009A/real_config_lstchain_belong_v0.9.9_tailcut147_9630.json
- lstchain v0.9.9
- MC: tailcut14-7, dynamic cleaning, NSB tuning
"image_modifier": { "increase_nsb": true, "extra_noise_in_dim_pixels": 6.426, "extra_bias_in_dim_pixels": 1.656, "transition_charge": 8, "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 8.776 "increase_psf": false, "smeared_light_fraction": 0 },
- Config file: /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/scripts/_configs/GRB221009A/lstchain_MC_config_lstchain_belong_v0.9.9_tailcut147_NSBDL1to9630.json
Random forest
RFs were produced with lstMCpipe
- lstchain-v0.9.9
- lstMCpipe-v0.9.0 (for run 9629) and lstMCpipe-v0.9.0 (for run 9630)
- source-indep (the standard one for the AllSky MC production)
/fefs/aswg/data/models/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/dec_2276/ /fefs/aswg/workspace/MC_data_simlink/models/AllSky/20230123_GRB221009A_moon_mild_ph/dec_2276/
DL2 data
- lstchain-v0.9.9
- source-indep
/fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL2/AllSky/20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned/TestingDataset/dec_2276/node_theta_* /fefs/aswg/workspace/MC_data_simlink/DL2/AllSky/20230123_GRB221009A_moon_mild_ph/TestingDataset/dec_2276/node_theta_* /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/Analysis/results/real/DL2/20221015/srcind/v0.9.9/tailcut84_dynclg_tNSBtoCrabPerfPaper/AllSky_20221027_v0.9.9_crab_tuned_dec_2276/dl2_* /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/Analysis/results/real/DL2/20221015/srcind/v0.9.9/tailcut147_dynclg_tNSBmildMoon9630/AllSky_20230123_GRB221009A_moon_mild_ph_dec_2276/dl2_*
- config file
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221015/v0.9/tailcut84/log/lstchain_config_v0.9.4_from2022onwards.json /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/scripts/_configs/GRB221009A/real_config_lstchain_belong_v0.9.9_tailcut147_9630.json /fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20221015/v0.9/tailcut84/log/lstchain_config_v0.9.4_from2022onwards.json /fefs/aswg/workspace/arnau.aguasca/scripts/_configs/GRB221009A/lstchain_MC_config_lstchain_belong_v0.9.9_NSBDL1to9629.json
DL2 data selection to produce theta2 plots
Information about the quality cuts to produce the theta2 plots.
Example
- intensity > 50
- r: [0, 1 ]
- wl: [0.01, 1 ]
- leakage_intensity_width_2: [0, 0.2 ]
- event_type: [32, 32]
- source-indep
- fixed_gh_cut: 0.7 (standard cut)
- fixed_theta_cut: 0.2 (standard cut)
Theta2 plot
Analysis Results
Please place higher-level analysis results (Spectra, SkyMaps, Lightcurves, etc) here.