Difference between revisions of "SN2023ixf"
(Created page with "thumb|right|300px|SN2023ixf in M101. Credit: Daniel Korona ==General information== * '''Name of the source''': SN2023ixf * '''Brief description...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Image:SN2023ixf_image.jpeg|thumb|right|300px|SN2023ixf in M101. Credit: | + | [[Image:SN2023ixf_image.jpeg|thumb|right|300px|SN2023ixf in M101. Credit:]] |
==General information== | ==General information== | ||
Revision as of 22:10, 22 May 2023
File:SN2023ixf image.jpeg
SN2023ixf in M101. Credit:
General information
- Name of the source: SN2023ixf
- Brief description of the source:
- - Object type : SN type II(?)
- - Distance (pc) : XXX +/- XXX
- - Other relevant information: Supernova outburst in May 19 2023 (ref)
- - RA: 14 03 38.557 (hh mm ss), Dec: +54 18 42.03 (dd mm ss)
- - RA, Dec in deg (ICRS): 210.910653712 +54.311674484
Data-taking information
- Dates of data-taking (yyyymmdd): 20230520
- - Date [yyyymmdd] (time of observation h): 20230520 (X.XX)
- ELOG link: [1]
- ZD range (deg): [XX, XX]
- AZ range (deg): [XX, XX]
- Transmission9km: 0.XX-X.XX
- Runs: XXXX-XXXX
- Joint observations with MAGIC? :
- Comments: Dark conditions. The transmission values from the LIDAR SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED. The LIDAR was back on May 16. The following message was sent to MAGIC shifters "the profiles are not well calibrated and the transmission values therefore not very accurate. So do not trust the transmissions for now"
