Difference between revisions of "OP313"

Latest revision as of 23:17, 14 December 2023

- Object type : FSRQ

- RA: 13 10 28.66 (hh mm ss), Dec: +32 20 43.78 (dd mm ss)

- redshift: z=0.99591

Analysis_OP313_Dec_2023_ToO (Fast analysis by Daniel, Jorge, Seiya)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 * '''Brief description of the source''':
 :- Object type : FSRQ
-:- RA: 3 19 48.16 (hh mm ss), Dec: +41 30 42.1088 (dd mm ss)
+:- RA: 13 10 28.66 (hh mm ss), Dec: +32 20 43.78 (dd mm ss)
+:- redshift: z=0.99591
 == OP313 data analysis ==
@@ Line 12: / Line 13: @@
 [[ Analysis_OP313_Spring_2022_ToO ]]
-[[ Analysis_NGC1275_Dec_2022_w_IRF_interpolation_Priyadarshi ]] (Dec 2022, source-independent, IRF interpolation, energy-dependent cuts. Dec 20 flare for ATel https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=15819 )
+[[ Analysis_OP313_Dec_2023_ToO ]] (Fast analysis by Daniel, Jorge, Seiya)
-[[ Analysis_NGC1275_Dec_2022_source_dep_Nozaki ]] (Dec 20 Flare, source-dependent, IRF interpolation, energy-dependent cuts for ATel https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=15819 )
-== Preliminary results ==
-We took some data last night on OP 313 since a fermi analysis showed it was in a high state (~ 0.5 1e-6 /cm^2/s):
-https://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssc/data/access/lat/lcr/source.html?source_name=4FGL_J1310.5+3221#
-http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=OP+313
-Analysis made by Chaitanya Priyadarshi, seiya_nozaki  and  María Láinez
-[[File:image.png]]
-[[File:excess.png]]
-[[File:Theta2_counts_OP313_6_wob_obs_Run_8099_to_8104_3_en_bins.png]]
-No detection