Crab Sanity check JorgeOtero

General information

• Name of the source: CrabNebula
• Nights and runs used (after data cleaning):

-2023-12-10: 15969, 15971, 15972
-2023-12-11: 15999, 16000, 16001, 16002, 16003
-2023-12-12: 16038
-2023-12-13: 16071, 16072, 16073, 16074, 16075
-2023-12-14: 16110
-2023-12-15: 16147
-2023-12-16: 16173, 16179, 16180, 16180, 16181, 16182, 16183, 16184, 16185, 16186
-2023-12-17: 16204, 16205, 16216, 16217
-2023-12-18: 16237

• Zenith distance of the data: 10-55 deg

Theta2 plots

• Theta2 plots

Energy dependent cuts: 0.8gh efficiency, 0.7theta efficiency 

Energy dependent cuts (0.8 gammaness, 0.7 theta), interpolated IRFs

Different energy bins:

Energy dependent cuts (0.8 gammaness, 0.7 theta), interpolated IRFs

SED

Average SED using a Log-Parabola function

Energy dependent cuts (0.8 gammaness, 0.7 theta), interpolated IRFs

Spectral parameters:
F0=(1.99 土 0.03)・10e-10 TeV-1 cm-2 s-1
alpha=2.322 土 0.015
beta=0.117 土 0.011
E0=0.51 TeV

Lightcurve

Lightcurve above 100 GeV 

Energy dependent cuts (0.8 gammaness, 0.7 theta), interpolated IRFs

 F=(5.868 土 0.082)e-10 cm-2 s-1
Consistent with the performance paper. As shown by this paper, the flux measured by LST-1 is slightly 
higher (~10%) than that from the MAGIC reference.