Difference between revisions of "OP313 Dec2023 Jan2024 LST1 analysis details"

From my_wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Gammapy settings)
(Analysis cross-check)
Line 82: Line 82:
 
|+ Best-fit spectral parameters
 
|+ Best-fit spectral parameters
 
|-
 
|-
! Analyzer !! Analysis method !! Spectral model !! Index !! Amplitude [TeV-1 s-1 cm-2] !! E_ref [GeV] !! alpha_norm  
+
! Analyzer !! Analysis method !! Spectral model !! EBL model !! Index !! Amplitude [x 10<sup>8<\sup> TeV-1 s-1 cm-2] !! E_ref [GeV] !! alpha_norm  
 
|-
 
|-
| Seiya || source-dependent || PWL+EBL || 2.37 +/- 0.88 || (0.82 +/- 0.14)e-08 || 100 || 1.0
+
| Seiya || source-dependent || PWL+EBL || Saldana-Lopez 2021 || 2.37 +/- 0.88 || 0.82 +/- 0.14 || 100 || 1.0
 
|-
 
|-
| Jorge || source-independent || PWL+EBL || 2.07 +/- 0.51 || (1.15 +/- 0.13)e-08 || 100 || 1.0
+
| Jorge || source-independent || PWL+EBL || Saldana-Lopez 2021 || 2.07 +/- 0.51 || 1.15 +/- 0.13 || 100 || 1.0
 
|-
 
|-
| Mireia || source-independent || PWL+EBL || 1.86 +/- 0.50 || (0.93 +/- 0.11)e-08 || 100 || 1.0
+
| Mireia || source-independent || PWL+EBL || Dominguez 20211 || 1.86 +/- 0.50 || 0.93 +/- 0.11 || 100 || 1.0
 
|-
 
|-
| Daniel || source-independent || PWL+EBL || 2.00 +/- 0.45 || (1.14 +/- 0.13)e-08 || 100 || 1.0
+
| Daniel || source-independent || PWL+EBL || Saldana-Lopez 2021 || 2.00 +/- 0.45 || 1.14 +/- 0.13 || 100 || 1.0
 
|}
 
|}
  

Revision as of 14:44, 26 February 2024

LST analysis OP313 Dec 2023 and Jan 2024

Wiki page with general information on all results for the paper: December_January_paper

LST-1 analyzers:

  • Seiya Nozaki (MPP)
  • Jorge Otero-Santos (IAA-CSIC)
  • Mireia Nievas-Rosillo (IAC)
  • Daniel Morcuende (IAA-CSIC)

Data-taking information

  • NSB level: all data was taken in dark NSB conditions
  • Zenith angles: 15-54 deg (December 2023 data have zenith angle > 30 deg)

Good-quality selected dataset

The list of data runs below was obtained using the notebook https://github.com/cta-observatory/cta-lstchain/blob/main/notebooks/data_quality.ipynb.

We used default settings, but min_drdi_at_422pe = 1.2 instead of the default 1.5 to recover 1.7 h from January 2024 where low statistics limit us. Still, the data selected have a relative light yield above ~80%.

Also, short data runs (< 5 min) were excluded, because usually short runs are a symptom of problems during data acquisition.


Qualitycuts1 op313.png

Qualitycuts op313 2.png


'2023-12-09': [15942, 15943, 15944, 15945],
'2023-12-10': [15975, 15976, 15977, 15978],
'2023-12-11': [16007, 16008, 16009, 16010],
'2023-12-12': [16042, 16043, 16044, 16045],
'2023-12-13': [16079, 16080, 16081, 16082, 16083],
'2023-12-14': [16114, 16116, 16117, 16118, 16119],
'2023-12-15': [16150, 16151, 16152, 16153, 16154, 16155, 16156],
'2023-12-16': [16188, 16189, 16191, 16192, 16193],
'2023-12-17': [16220, 16221, 16222, 16223, 16224, 16225],
'2023-12-18': [16240, 16241, 16242, 16243, 16244, 16246],
'2024-01-09': [16293, 16294, 16295],
'2024-01-13': [16350, 16351, 16352, 16353, 16354, 16356, 16357, 16358, 16359],
'2024-01-17': [16391, 16392],
'2024-01-19': [16412, 16413, 16414, 16415],
'2024-01-21': [16418, 16419, 16420]

In total, there are 19.8 hours effective time.

  • Relative light yield of the selected data:

Evolution rel light yield op313.png

Rel light yield op313.png



lstchain settings

  • lstchain version: v0.10.7
  • MC production: 20230901_v0.10.4_allsky_base_prod
  • RF models: /fefs/aswg/data/models/AllSky/20230901_v0.10.4_allsky_base_prod/dec_3476/
  • DL2 MC for IRF calculation: /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL2/AllSky/20230901_v0.10.4_allsky_base_prod/TestingDataset/dec_3476
  • Used IRF interpolation
  • Energy threshold: ~ 40 GeV
  • Selection cuts IRF and DL3: 70% efficiency in both gammaness and theta gamma-ray selection cuts. Intensity > 50 p.e.

Gammapy settings

  • Gammapy version: v1.1
  • Energy binning:
reco energy axis: 5 GeV - 10 TeV, 5 bins per decade
true energy axis: 1 GeV - 20 TeV, 10 bins per decade
  • 3 off positions for SED and LC calculation
  • Safe mask: 5% of max. Aeff
  • Energy range for spectral fitting: 70 GeV - 1 TeV
  • redshift: 0.997

Analysis cross-check

Cross-checks of different LST-1 analysis results.

Best-fit spectral parameters
Analyzer Analysis method Spectral model EBL model Index Amplitude [x 108<\sup> TeV-1 s-1 cm-2] E_ref [GeV] alpha_norm
Seiya source-dependent PWL+EBL Saldana-Lopez 2021 2.37 +/- 0.88 0.82 +/- 0.14 100 1.0
Jorge source-independent PWL+EBL Saldana-Lopez 2021 2.07 +/- 0.51 1.15 +/- 0.13 100 1.0
Mireia source-independent PWL+EBL Dominguez 20211 1.86 +/- 0.50 0.93 +/- 0.11 100 1.0
Daniel source-independent PWL+EBL Saldana-Lopez 2021 2.00 +/- 0.45 1.14 +/- 0.13 100 1.0


Cross-check of LST-1 SED from OP313 during high-flux period (Dec 2023).
Cross-check of LST-1 LC from OP313 (Dec 9th 2023 to Jan 21th 2024).


Go back to wiki page with general information on all results for the paper