Difference between revisions of "BLLac2022flare"

From my_wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==General information== * '''Name of the source''': BL Lacertae * '''Brief description of the source''': :- Object type : Blazar :- RA: 22 02 43.3 (hh mm ss), Dec: +42 16 40...")
 
(→‎Lightcurve)
 
(91 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
=BL Lacertae 2022 flare project=
 +
Major flare from BL Lacertae between September and November 2022, one of the (if not the) longest VHE flare observed from the source, and the brightest together with the 2021 flare.
 +
 +
We aim to characterize the VHE and MWL variability during the flare, both in flux and spectral variability, with focus on the intranight minute timescale variations in the VHE band, and to perform a sort of time dependent modelling of the emission to interpret the evolution of the flare in terms of physical mechanisms and paramters.
 +
 
==General information==
 
==General information==
 
* '''Name of the source''': BL Lacertae
 
* '''Name of the source''': BL Lacertae
Line 4: Line 9:
 
:- Object type : Blazar
 
:- Object type : Blazar
 
:- RA: 22 02 43.3 (hh mm ss), Dec: +42 16 40 (dd mm ss)
 
:- RA: 22 02 43.3 (hh mm ss), Dec: +42 16 40 (dd mm ss)
 +
 +
* Analysis by:
 +
** Jorge Otero Santos (IAA-CSIC, joteros@iaa.es)
 +
** Daniel Morcuende (IAA-CSIC, dmorcuende@iaa.es)
 +
 +
==Data-taking information==
 +
* '''Dates of data-taking''':
 +
** Date: 16/09/2022-25/11/2022 (53 h before cuts)
 +
***ZD range (deg): 15-60 deg
 +
***AZ range (deg): 0-60 and 300-360 deg
 +
***Joint observations with MAGIC? : No
 +
***Runs:
 +
 +
<nowiki>
 +
1 : 2022-09-16 : 9228 to 9232
 +
2 : 2022-09-21 : 9262 to 9268
 +
3 : 2022-09-22 : 9347 to 9350
 +
4: 2022-10-01: 9453 to 9461
 +
5: 2022-10-03: 9544 to 9555
 +
6: 2022-10-15: 9631 to 9635
 +
7: 2022-10-16: 9648
 +
8: 2022-10-17: 9678 to 9685
 +
9: 2022-10-18: 9697 to 9706
 +
10: 2022-10-19: 9729 to 9739
 +
11: 2022-10-20: 9753 to 9761
 +
12: 2022-10-21: 9808 to 9815
 +
13: 2022-10-23: 9836 to 9848
 +
14: 2022-10-24: 9864 to 9873
 +
15: 2022-10-25: 9892 to 9900
 +
16: 2022-10-26: 9921 to 9924
 +
17: 2022-10-27: 9940 to 9944
 +
18: 2022-10-28: 9969 to 9973
 +
19: 2022-10-29: 9993 to 9995
 +
20: 2022-10-31: 10022 to 10029
 +
21: 2022-11-01: 10069 to 10076
 +
22: 2022-11-02: 10193 to 10204
 +
23: 2022-11-13: 10508 to 10512
 +
24: 2022-11-14: 10521 to 10523
 +
25: 2022-11-15: 10586 to 10588
 +
26: 2022-11-16: 10616 to 10620
 +
27: 2022-11-17: 10652 to 10655
 +
28: 2022-11-18: 10827 to 10830
 +
29: 2022-11-19: 10870 to 10872
 +
30: 2022-11-25: 11033 to 11037
 +
</nowiki>
 +
 +
[[File:zenith_azimuth_distributions_bllac.png|1000px]]
 +
 +
==Data-quality selection==
 +
Used latest version of the data quality selection notebook.
 +
 +
Standard configuration + dR/dI cosmics rate @ 422 p.e. = 1.2
 +
 +
Cut of max_diffuse_nsb_std = 2.3 for moon data selection
 +
 +
[[File:Data_quality_selection_bllac.png|720px]]
 +
[[File:RelLightYield_bllac_selection.png|720px]]
 +
[[File:CosmicsTriggerRate_bllac_selection.png|1200px]]
 +
 +
*Selected dark runs: 104 of 193 runs (29 h)
 +
 +
<nowiki>
 +
1 : 2022-09-21 : 9262 to 9268
 +
2: 2022-10-01: 9459 to 9461
 +
3: 2022-10-03: 9544
 +
4: 2022-10-16: 9648
 +
5: 2022-10-17: 9678 to 9683
 +
6: 2022-10-18: 9698 to 9705
 +
7: 2022-10-19: 9730 to 9739
 +
8: 2022-10-20: 9753 to 9761
 +
9: 2022-10-21: 9809 to 9814
 +
10: 2022-10-23: 9843, 9844, 9845, 9846, 9848
 +
11: 2022-10-24: 9866
 +
12: 2022-10-25: 9892 to 9900
 +
13: 2022-10-26: 9921 to 9924
 +
14: 2022-10-27: 9940 to 9944
 +
15: 2022-10-29: 9993 to 9995
 +
16: 2022-10-31: 10025, 10026, 10028, 10029
 +
17: 2022-11-13: 10508
 +
18: 2022-11-15: 10586 to 10587
 +
19: 2022-11-16: 10616 to 10620
 +
20: 2022-11-17: 10652 to 10655
 +
21: 2022-11-18: 10827 to 10830
 +
22: 2022-11-19: 10871 to 10872
 +
23: 2022-11-25: 11033 to 11037
 +
</nowiki>
 +
 +
*Selected moon runs: 30 of 193 runs (8 h)
 +
 +
<nowiki>
 +
1: 2022-10-01: 9453 to 9457
 +
2: 2022-10-03: 9544, 9545, 9546, 9548, 9549, 9550, 9551, 9552
 +
3: 2022-10-15: 9631, 9633, 9634, 9635
 +
4: 2022-10-17: 9684
 +
5: 2022-10-31: 10022 to 10023
 +
6: 2022-11-01: 10071, 10072, 10073, 10074, 10076
 +
7: 2022-11-13: 10509 to 10512
 +
8: 2022-11-14: 10523
 +
</nowiki>
 +
 +
==Monte Carlo information==
 +
* Link to MC files used:
 +
**Dark data: /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL2/AllSky/20230925_v0.10.4_src3_dec3476_4822_tuned/TestingDataset/dec_3476/
 +
**Moon data: /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL2/AllSky/20240426_v0.10.9_src3_dec3476_4822_tunedNSB/TestingDataset/dec_3476/ (tuned NSBs and cleaning to match that needed for the real data)
 +
 +
==DL1 data==
 +
 +
'''Dark data''' :
 +
 +
Standard data from /fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/ with version v0.9 and cleaning tailcut84
 +
 +
'''Moon data''' :
 +
 +
Moon data reprocessed to produce the DL1b files with the optimal cleaning for moon analysis as calculated with lstchain_dvr_pixselector -f "/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/2022XXXX/v0.9/tailcut84/dl1_LST-1.RunXXXXX'.*.h5"
 +
Reprocessed using DL1a files produced by LSTOSA (lstchain v0.10.XX) and dl1ab script (v0.7.5)
 +
 +
* original DL1a files
 +
 +
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/2022XXXX/v0.9/tailcut84/dl1_LST-1.Run0XXXX.XXXX.h5
 +
 +
* Produced DL1b files
 +
 +
/fefs/aswg/workspace/daniel.morcuende/data/real/DL1b/BLLac_2022_NSB/tailcut_*_*/merged
 +
 +
<nowiki>
 +
tailcut105: 09454, 09455, 09456, 09457, 09631, 09684
 +
tailcut126: 09453, 09551, 09552, 10022, 10023, 10509, 10523
 +
tailcut147: 09546, 09548, 09549, 09550, 09633, 09634, 09635, 10071, 10072, 10073, 10074, 10076, 10510, 10511
 +
tailcut168: 09544, 09545, 10512
 +
</nowiki>
 +
 +
==Low-level analysis==
 +
 +
*Interpolated IRFs
 +
*Custom MC and models (as explained above for dark/moon data)
 +
*Standard 70% efficiency energy dependent cuts
 +
*Max theta cut = 0.2
 +
*Intensity dark = 50
 +
*Intensity moon = 100
 +
 +
==High-level analysis==
 +
 +
*lstchain v0.10.11 to generate source-indep interpolated IRF, energy dependent cuts DL3
 +
*Science Tool: gammapy 1.1
 +
*point-like IRF, 1D analysis
 +
*Aeff>5%
 +
*3OFF
 +
 +
==Energy threshold==
 +
 +
Calculated from the dark MCs up to the Zd of BL Lac observations (evaluated from the MCs between 30 and 60 deg): ~80 GeV
 +
 +
[[File:Ethreshold_dark.png|500px]]
 +
 +
Calculated from the moon NSB-tuned MCs up to the Zd of BL Lac observations (evaluated from the MCs between 30 and 60 deg , to be re-evaluated with tuned-NSB+tuned-cleaning MCs): ~100 GeV
 +
 +
[[File:Ethreshold_moon.png|500px]]
 +
 +
NOTES ON THE ENERGY THRESHOLD CALCULATION:
 +
 +
*For the dark data, the distribution is calculated in a rather conservative way, with MCs >32deg Zd.
 +
*For moon data:
 +
**The distribution is calculated above 10deg (~minimum of BL Lacs observations)
 +
**Above 30deg the Eth is ~130 GeV
 +
**Only 9 runs with moon above 40 deg zenith, most of the data (except ~3 hours) described by an Eth<100-130 GeV
 +
**21 runs remaining <30deg Zd, where the Eth is 130 GeV or less (~100 GeV for the lowest zeniths)
 +
 +
==Jorge's Analysis Results==
 +
 +
We produce the stacked and daily theta2 plots and average SED.
 +
 +
With the average SED, a preliminary LC is also computed and a Bayesian Block analysis. We then calculate the SED of each BB to look for spectral variability (see below the BB definition).
 +
 +
For a more precise LC, we then use the SED of each block to calculate the LC block by block to build the long-term final LC. This is to avoid miscalculations in the integral flux caused by using the wrong spectral shape if there is strong spectral variability.
 +
 +
We take as reference the energy threshold estimated from the moon MCs for the minimum energy in which we integrate the flux for the LC. This energy threshold is specified above.
 +
 +
Configuration of the analysis:
 +
 +
*E_reco=[20,20000] GeV
 +
*E_true=[10,50000] GeV
 +
*n_bins_reco=5-10 (depending on the flux level)
 +
*n_bins_true=10-20 (depending on the flux level)
 +
*E_fit=[20,20000] GeV
 +
*Spectral shape: Log parabola+EBL (Saldaña-Lopez21, z=0.069)
 +
*Analysis type: stack
 +
*LC energy: 3 different Emin tested to account for possible threshold increase due to moon
 +
**E=[100,20000] GeV
 +
**E=[150,20000] GeV
 +
**E=[200,20000] GeV
 +
 +
The rest of the details of the high-level analysis are as specified above.
 +
 +
=== Theta2 plot ===
 +
 +
All data stacked (>20 GeV left, >100 GeV right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_theta2_stacked_20GeV.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_theta2_stacked_100GeV.png|500px]]
 +
 +
20 October >100 GeV (left), 13 November >100 GeV (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_theta2_20oct_100GeV.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_theta2_13nov_100GeV.png|500px]]
 +
 +
=== Lightcurve ===
 +
 +
Complete LC calculated as detailed above (using the SED of each BB, shown below, for the flux integration). We test different energy mins as specified above.
 +
 +
Emin 100 GeV (left), 150 GeV (center) and 200 GeV (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_100GeV.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_150GeV.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_200GeV.png|500px]]
 +
 +
Flux value for Emin = 100 GeV (average flux calculated only from significant flux points, i.e. TS>4)
 +
 +
*Average flux:
 +
*Maximum flux (nightwise): (9.9 +/- 0.2)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 2.1 C.U.
 +
 +
Flux value for Emin = 150 GeV (average flux calculated only from significant flux points, i.e. TS>4)
 +
 +
*Average flux:
 +
*Maximum flux (nightwise): (4.7 +/- 0.2)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 1.6 C.U.
 +
 +
Flux value for Emin = 200 GeV (average flux calculated only from significant flux points, i.e. TS>4)
 +
 +
*Average flux:
 +
*Maximum flux (nightwise): (2.7 +/- 0.1)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 1.4 C.U.
 +
 +
We also calculate the intranight lightcurves for the nights of Oct. 20 and Nov. 13, 2022.
 +
 +
For the former, given that it is all dark data, we use an energy threshold of 100 GeV, and we compare a 5-min (left) and a 10-min binning (right).
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_20Oct_5min_100GeV.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_20Oct_10min_100GeV.png|500px]]
 +
 +
*Average flux: f = (9.9 +/- 0.2)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 2.1 C.U.
 +
*Maximum flux: f = (2.0 +/- 0.2)e-9 cm-2 s-1 = 4.3 C.U.
 +
 +
For the latter we test as Emin 100 GeV, 150 GeV and 200 GeV due to the moon, with a 5-min binning.
 +
 +
Emin 100 GeV (left), 150 GeV (center) and 200 GeV (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_13Nov_5minbin_100GeV.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_13Nov_5minbin_150GeV.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_13Nov_5minbin_200GeV.png|500px]]
 +
 +
Flux value for Emin = 100 GeV
 +
 +
*Average flux: f = (8.4 +/- 0.3)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 1.8 C.U.
 +
*Maximum flux: f = (1.8 +/- 0.1)e-9 cm-2 s-1 = 3.8 C.U.
 +
 +
Flux value for Emin = 150 GeV
 +
 +
*Average flux: f = (4.5 +/- 0.2)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 1.5 C.U.
 +
*Maximum flux: f = (9.1 +/- 0.8)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 3.1 C.U.
 +
 +
Flux value for Emin = 200 GeV
 +
 +
*Average flux: f = (2.7 +/- 0.1)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 1.4 C.U.
 +
*Maximum flux: f = (5.1 +/- 0.5)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 2.5 C.U.
 +
 +
=== Spectral results ===
 +
 +
Average SED (parameters correspond to the EBL-corrected spectrum using the EBL model from Saldaña-Lopez 2021)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_average_SED.png|500px]]
 +
 +
*f0 = (4.28 +/- 0.17)e-13 GeV-1 cm-2 s-1
 +
*E0 = 223 GeV
 +
*alpha = 2.97 +/- 0.04
 +
*beta = 0.13 +/- 0.04
 +
*alpha_norm = 1
 +
*redshift = 0.069
 +
 +
We calculate also the SED of each Bayesian Block (also considering a log-parabola plus EBL). BB4 and BB8 correspond to the nights of Oct. 20 and Nov. 13, 2022, respectively.
 +
 +
BB1 (left) and BB2 (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB1_SED.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB2_SED.png|500px]]
 +
 +
BB3 (left) and BB4 (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB3_SED.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB4_SED.png|500px]]
 +
 +
BB5 (left) and BB6 (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB5_SED.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB6_SED.png|500px]]
 +
 +
BB7 (left) and BB8 (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB7_SED.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB8_SED.png|500px]]
 +
 +
BB9 (left) and BB10 (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB9_SED.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB10_SED.png|500px]]
 +
 +
==Daniel's Analysis Results==
 +
 +
Relevant details
 +
 +
=== Theta2 plot ===
 +
 +
=== Lightcurve ===
 +
 +
=== Spectral results ===
 +
 +
== Crosschecked plots ==
 +
 +
=== Lightcurve ===
 +
 +
Complete LC calculated as detailed above (using the SED of each BB, shown below, for the flux integration). We test different energy mins as specified above.
 +
 +
Emin 100 GeV (left), 150 GeV (center) and 200 GeV (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_100GeV_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_150GeV_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_200GeV_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
 +
We also calculate the intranight lightcurves for the nights of Oct. 20 and Nov. 13, 2022.
 +
 +
For the former, given that it is all dark data, we use an energy threshold of 100 GeV, and we compare a 5-min (left) and a 10-min binning (right).
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_20Oct_5min_100GeV_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_20Oct_10min_100GeV_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
 +
For the latter we test as Emin 100 GeV, 150 GeV and 200 GeV due to the moon, with a 5-min binning.
 +
 +
Emin 100 GeV (left), 150 GeV (center) and 200 GeV (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_13Nov_5min_100GeV_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_13Nov_5min_150GeV_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_lightcurve_13Nov_5min_200GeV_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
 +
=== Spectral results ===
 +
 +
Average SED (parameters correspond to the EBL-corrected spectrum using the EBL model from Saldaña-Lopez 2021)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_average_SED_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
 +
 +
We calculate also the SED of each Bayesian Block (also considering a log-parabola plus EBL). BB4 and BB8 correspond to the nights of Oct. 20 and Nov. 13, 2022, respectively.
 +
 +
BB1 (left) and BB2 (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB1_SED_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB2_SED_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
 +
BB3 (left) and BB4 (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB3_SED_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB4_SED_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
 +
BB5 (left) and BB6 (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB5_SED_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB6_SED_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
 +
BB7 (left) and BB8 (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB7_SED_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB8_SED_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
 +
BB9 (left) and BB10 (right)
 +
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB9_SED_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
[[File:BLLac_BB10_SED_crosscheck.png|500px]]
 +
 +
== Bayesian blocks ==
 +
1. 21/09/2022 22:50:00 to 04/10/2022 00:57:00
 +
2. 15/10/2022 23:25:00 to 18/10/2022 01:37:00
 +
3. 18/10/2022 22:09:00 to 20/10/2022 01:57:00
 +
4. 20/10/2022 21:56:00 to 21/10/2022 00:39:00
 +
5. 21/10/2022 22:57:00 to 26/10/2022 23:38:00
 +
6. 27/10/2022 23:37:00 to 28/10/2022 01:00:00
 +
7. 29/10/2022 23:44:00 to 03/11/2022 00:11:00
 +
8. 13/11/2022 22:26:00 to 13/11/2022 23:47:00
 +
9. 14/11/2022 23:18:00 to 20/11/2022 00:04:00
 +
10. 25/11/2022 21:45:00 to 25/11/2022 22:30:00

Latest revision as of 08:59, 1 July 2024

BL Lacertae 2022 flare project[edit]

Major flare from BL Lacertae between September and November 2022, one of the (if not the) longest VHE flare observed from the source, and the brightest together with the 2021 flare.

We aim to characterize the VHE and MWL variability during the flare, both in flux and spectral variability, with focus on the intranight minute timescale variations in the VHE band, and to perform a sort of time dependent modelling of the emission to interpret the evolution of the flare in terms of physical mechanisms and paramters.

General information[edit]

  • Name of the source: BL Lacertae
  • Brief description of the source:
- Object type : Blazar
- RA: 22 02 43.3 (hh mm ss), Dec: +42 16 40 (dd mm ss)
  • Analysis by:
    • Jorge Otero Santos (IAA-CSIC, joteros@iaa.es)
    • Daniel Morcuende (IAA-CSIC, dmorcuende@iaa.es)

Data-taking information[edit]

  • Dates of data-taking:
    • Date: 16/09/2022-25/11/2022 (53 h before cuts)
      • ZD range (deg): 15-60 deg
      • AZ range (deg): 0-60 and 300-360 deg
      • Joint observations with MAGIC? : No
      • Runs:
1 : 2022-09-16 : 9228 to 9232
2 : 2022-09-21 : 9262 to 9268
3 : 2022-09-22 : 9347 to 9350
4: 2022-10-01: 9453 to 9461
5: 2022-10-03: 9544 to 9555
6: 2022-10-15: 9631 to 9635
7: 2022-10-16: 9648
8: 2022-10-17: 9678 to 9685
9: 2022-10-18: 9697 to 9706
10: 2022-10-19: 9729 to 9739
11: 2022-10-20: 9753 to 9761
12: 2022-10-21: 9808 to 9815
13: 2022-10-23: 9836 to 9848
14: 2022-10-24: 9864 to 9873
15: 2022-10-25: 9892 to 9900
16: 2022-10-26: 9921 to 9924
17: 2022-10-27: 9940 to 9944
18: 2022-10-28: 9969 to 9973
19: 2022-10-29: 9993 to 9995
20: 2022-10-31: 10022 to 10029
21: 2022-11-01: 10069 to 10076
22: 2022-11-02: 10193 to 10204
23: 2022-11-13: 10508 to 10512
24: 2022-11-14: 10521 to 10523
25: 2022-11-15: 10586 to 10588
26: 2022-11-16: 10616 to 10620
27: 2022-11-17: 10652 to 10655
28: 2022-11-18: 10827 to 10830
29: 2022-11-19: 10870 to 10872
30: 2022-11-25: 11033 to 11037

Zenith azimuth distributions bllac.png

Data-quality selection[edit]

Used latest version of the data quality selection notebook.

Standard configuration + dR/dI cosmics rate @ 422 p.e. = 1.2

Cut of max_diffuse_nsb_std = 2.3 for moon data selection

Data quality selection bllac.png RelLightYield bllac selection.png CosmicsTriggerRate bllac selection.png

  • Selected dark runs: 104 of 193 runs (29 h)
1 : 2022-09-21 : 9262 to 9268
2: 2022-10-01: 9459 to 9461
3: 2022-10-03: 9544
4: 2022-10-16: 9648
5: 2022-10-17: 9678 to 9683
6: 2022-10-18: 9698 to 9705
7: 2022-10-19: 9730 to 9739
8: 2022-10-20: 9753 to 9761
9: 2022-10-21: 9809 to 9814
10: 2022-10-23: 9843, 9844, 9845, 9846, 9848
11: 2022-10-24: 9866
12: 2022-10-25: 9892 to 9900
13: 2022-10-26: 9921 to 9924
14: 2022-10-27: 9940 to 9944
15: 2022-10-29: 9993 to 9995
16: 2022-10-31: 10025, 10026, 10028, 10029
17: 2022-11-13: 10508
18: 2022-11-15: 10586 to 10587
19: 2022-11-16: 10616 to 10620
20: 2022-11-17: 10652 to 10655
21: 2022-11-18: 10827 to 10830
22: 2022-11-19: 10871 to 10872
23: 2022-11-25: 11033 to 11037
  • Selected moon runs: 30 of 193 runs (8 h)
1: 2022-10-01: 9453 to 9457
2: 2022-10-03: 9544, 9545, 9546, 9548, 9549, 9550, 9551, 9552
3: 2022-10-15: 9631, 9633, 9634, 9635
4: 2022-10-17: 9684
5: 2022-10-31: 10022 to 10023
6: 2022-11-01: 10071, 10072, 10073, 10074, 10076
7: 2022-11-13: 10509 to 10512
8: 2022-11-14: 10523

Monte Carlo information[edit]

  • Link to MC files used:
    • Dark data: /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL2/AllSky/20230925_v0.10.4_src3_dec3476_4822_tuned/TestingDataset/dec_3476/
    • Moon data: /fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL2/AllSky/20240426_v0.10.9_src3_dec3476_4822_tunedNSB/TestingDataset/dec_3476/ (tuned NSBs and cleaning to match that needed for the real data)

DL1 data[edit]

Dark data :

Standard data from /fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/ with version v0.9 and cleaning tailcut84

Moon data :

Moon data reprocessed to produce the DL1b files with the optimal cleaning for moon analysis as calculated with lstchain_dvr_pixselector -f "/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/2022XXXX/v0.9/tailcut84/dl1_LST-1.RunXXXXX'.*.h5" Reprocessed using DL1a files produced by LSTOSA (lstchain v0.10.XX) and dl1ab script (v0.7.5)

  • original DL1a files
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/2022XXXX/v0.9/tailcut84/dl1_LST-1.Run0XXXX.XXXX.h5
  • Produced DL1b files
/fefs/aswg/workspace/daniel.morcuende/data/real/DL1b/BLLac_2022_NSB/tailcut_*_*/merged

 tailcut105: 09454, 09455, 09456, 09457, 09631, 09684
 tailcut126: 09453, 09551, 09552, 10022, 10023, 10509, 10523
 tailcut147: 09546, 09548, 09549, 09550, 09633, 09634, 09635, 10071, 10072, 10073, 10074, 10076, 10510, 10511
 tailcut168: 09544, 09545, 10512

Low-level analysis[edit]

  • Interpolated IRFs
  • Custom MC and models (as explained above for dark/moon data)
  • Standard 70% efficiency energy dependent cuts
  • Max theta cut = 0.2
  • Intensity dark = 50
  • Intensity moon = 100

High-level analysis[edit]

  • lstchain v0.10.11 to generate source-indep interpolated IRF, energy dependent cuts DL3
  • Science Tool: gammapy 1.1
  • point-like IRF, 1D analysis
  • Aeff>5%
  • 3OFF

Energy threshold[edit]

Calculated from the dark MCs up to the Zd of BL Lac observations (evaluated from the MCs between 30 and 60 deg): ~80 GeV

Ethreshold dark.png

Calculated from the moon NSB-tuned MCs up to the Zd of BL Lac observations (evaluated from the MCs between 30 and 60 deg , to be re-evaluated with tuned-NSB+tuned-cleaning MCs): ~100 GeV

Ethreshold moon.png

NOTES ON THE ENERGY THRESHOLD CALCULATION:

  • For the dark data, the distribution is calculated in a rather conservative way, with MCs >32deg Zd.
  • For moon data:
    • The distribution is calculated above 10deg (~minimum of BL Lacs observations)
    • Above 30deg the Eth is ~130 GeV
    • Only 9 runs with moon above 40 deg zenith, most of the data (except ~3 hours) described by an Eth<100-130 GeV
    • 21 runs remaining <30deg Zd, where the Eth is 130 GeV or less (~100 GeV for the lowest zeniths)

Jorge's Analysis Results[edit]

We produce the stacked and daily theta2 plots and average SED.

With the average SED, a preliminary LC is also computed and a Bayesian Block analysis. We then calculate the SED of each BB to look for spectral variability (see below the BB definition).

For a more precise LC, we then use the SED of each block to calculate the LC block by block to build the long-term final LC. This is to avoid miscalculations in the integral flux caused by using the wrong spectral shape if there is strong spectral variability.

We take as reference the energy threshold estimated from the moon MCs for the minimum energy in which we integrate the flux for the LC. This energy threshold is specified above.

Configuration of the analysis:

  • E_reco=[20,20000] GeV
  • E_true=[10,50000] GeV
  • n_bins_reco=5-10 (depending on the flux level)
  • n_bins_true=10-20 (depending on the flux level)
  • E_fit=[20,20000] GeV
  • Spectral shape: Log parabola+EBL (Saldaña-Lopez21, z=0.069)
  • Analysis type: stack
  • LC energy: 3 different Emin tested to account for possible threshold increase due to moon
    • E=[100,20000] GeV
    • E=[150,20000] GeV
    • E=[200,20000] GeV

The rest of the details of the high-level analysis are as specified above.

Theta2 plot[edit]

All data stacked (>20 GeV left, >100 GeV right)

BLLac theta2 stacked 20GeV.png BLLac theta2 stacked 100GeV.png

20 October >100 GeV (left), 13 November >100 GeV (right)

BLLac theta2 20oct 100GeV.png BLLac theta2 13nov 100GeV.png

Lightcurve[edit]

Complete LC calculated as detailed above (using the SED of each BB, shown below, for the flux integration). We test different energy mins as specified above.

Emin 100 GeV (left), 150 GeV (center) and 200 GeV (right)

BLLac lightcurve 100GeV.png BLLac lightcurve 150GeV.png BLLac lightcurve 200GeV.png

Flux value for Emin = 100 GeV (average flux calculated only from significant flux points, i.e. TS>4)

  • Average flux:
  • Maximum flux (nightwise): (9.9 +/- 0.2)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 2.1 C.U.

Flux value for Emin = 150 GeV (average flux calculated only from significant flux points, i.e. TS>4)

  • Average flux:
  • Maximum flux (nightwise): (4.7 +/- 0.2)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 1.6 C.U.

Flux value for Emin = 200 GeV (average flux calculated only from significant flux points, i.e. TS>4)

  • Average flux:
  • Maximum flux (nightwise): (2.7 +/- 0.1)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 1.4 C.U.

We also calculate the intranight lightcurves for the nights of Oct. 20 and Nov. 13, 2022.

For the former, given that it is all dark data, we use an energy threshold of 100 GeV, and we compare a 5-min (left) and a 10-min binning (right).

BLLac lightcurve 20Oct 5min 100GeV.png BLLac lightcurve 20Oct 10min 100GeV.png

  • Average flux: f = (9.9 +/- 0.2)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 2.1 C.U.
  • Maximum flux: f = (2.0 +/- 0.2)e-9 cm-2 s-1 = 4.3 C.U.

For the latter we test as Emin 100 GeV, 150 GeV and 200 GeV due to the moon, with a 5-min binning.

Emin 100 GeV (left), 150 GeV (center) and 200 GeV (right)

BLLac lightcurve 13Nov 5minbin 100GeV.png BLLac lightcurve 13Nov 5minbin 150GeV.png BLLac lightcurve 13Nov 5minbin 200GeV.png

Flux value for Emin = 100 GeV

  • Average flux: f = (8.4 +/- 0.3)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 1.8 C.U.
  • Maximum flux: f = (1.8 +/- 0.1)e-9 cm-2 s-1 = 3.8 C.U.

Flux value for Emin = 150 GeV

  • Average flux: f = (4.5 +/- 0.2)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 1.5 C.U.
  • Maximum flux: f = (9.1 +/- 0.8)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 3.1 C.U.

Flux value for Emin = 200 GeV

  • Average flux: f = (2.7 +/- 0.1)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 1.4 C.U.
  • Maximum flux: f = (5.1 +/- 0.5)e-10 cm-2 s-1 = 2.5 C.U.

Spectral results[edit]

Average SED (parameters correspond to the EBL-corrected spectrum using the EBL model from Saldaña-Lopez 2021)

BLLac average SED.png

  • f0 = (4.28 +/- 0.17)e-13 GeV-1 cm-2 s-1
  • E0 = 223 GeV
  • alpha = 2.97 +/- 0.04
  • beta = 0.13 +/- 0.04
  • alpha_norm = 1
  • redshift = 0.069

We calculate also the SED of each Bayesian Block (also considering a log-parabola plus EBL). BB4 and BB8 correspond to the nights of Oct. 20 and Nov. 13, 2022, respectively.

BB1 (left) and BB2 (right)

BLLac BB1 SED.png BLLac BB2 SED.png

BB3 (left) and BB4 (right)

BLLac BB3 SED.png BLLac BB4 SED.png

BB5 (left) and BB6 (right)

BLLac BB5 SED.png BLLac BB6 SED.png

BB7 (left) and BB8 (right)

BLLac BB7 SED.png BLLac BB8 SED.png

BB9 (left) and BB10 (right)

BLLac BB9 SED.png BLLac BB10 SED.png

Daniel's Analysis Results[edit]

Relevant details

Theta2 plot[edit]

Lightcurve[edit]

Spectral results[edit]

Crosschecked plots[edit]

Lightcurve[edit]

Complete LC calculated as detailed above (using the SED of each BB, shown below, for the flux integration). We test different energy mins as specified above.

Emin 100 GeV (left), 150 GeV (center) and 200 GeV (right)

500px 500px 500px

We also calculate the intranight lightcurves for the nights of Oct. 20 and Nov. 13, 2022.

For the former, given that it is all dark data, we use an energy threshold of 100 GeV, and we compare a 5-min (left) and a 10-min binning (right).

BLLac lightcurve 20Oct 5min 100GeV crosscheck.png BLLac lightcurve 20Oct 10min 100GeV crosscheck.png

For the latter we test as Emin 100 GeV, 150 GeV and 200 GeV due to the moon, with a 5-min binning.

Emin 100 GeV (left), 150 GeV (center) and 200 GeV (right)

BLLac lightcurve 13Nov 5min 100GeV crosscheck.png 500px 500px

Spectral results[edit]

Average SED (parameters correspond to the EBL-corrected spectrum using the EBL model from Saldaña-Lopez 2021)

BLLac average SED crosscheck.png


We calculate also the SED of each Bayesian Block (also considering a log-parabola plus EBL). BB4 and BB8 correspond to the nights of Oct. 20 and Nov. 13, 2022, respectively.

BB1 (left) and BB2 (right)

500px 500px

BB3 (left) and BB4 (right)

500px BLLac BB4 SED crosscheck.png

BB5 (left) and BB6 (right)

500px 500px

BB7 (left) and BB8 (right)

500px BLLac BB8 SED crosscheck.png

BB9 (left) and BB10 (right)

500px 500px

Bayesian blocks[edit]

1. 21/09/2022 22:50:00 to 04/10/2022 00:57:00
2. 15/10/2022 23:25:00 to 18/10/2022 01:37:00
3. 18/10/2022 22:09:00 to 20/10/2022 01:57:00
4. 20/10/2022 21:56:00 to 21/10/2022 00:39:00
5. 21/10/2022 22:57:00 to 26/10/2022 23:38:00
6. 27/10/2022 23:37:00 to 28/10/2022 01:00:00
7. 29/10/2022 23:44:00 to 03/11/2022 00:11:00
8. 13/11/2022 22:26:00 to 13/11/2022 23:47:00
9. 14/11/2022 23:18:00 to 20/11/2022 00:04:00
10. 25/11/2022 21:45:00 to 25/11/2022 22:30:00
Retrieved from "https://www.lst1.iac.es/wiki/index.php?title=BLLac2022flare&oldid=10827"