Difference between revisions of "NGC 1068"
Sweta.menon (talk | contribs) |
Sweta.menon (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Source Name:NGC 1068 | Source Name:NGC 1068 | ||
| − | |||
= Source Parameters = | = Source Parameters = | ||
| − | Position: RA | + | Position: RA = 40.66962153 deg, Dec:-0.01329436 deg |
| − | = | + | Zenith = 29-70 deg |
= Cycle I = | = Cycle I = | ||
| + | |||
| + | Data from /fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/YYYYMMDD/v0.10/tailcut84 | ||
| + | |||
| + | MC files : dec_min_413 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:MC_Model_NGC_1068.jpg]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:E_threshold_20_40_zenith.jpg]][[File:E_threshold_20_50_zenith.jpg]][[File:E_threshold_20_70_zenith.jpg]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Energy threshold is quite high(~ 500 GeV) if I include all the data. So as balance between including as much events as possible, I am doing my analysis with a zenith cut of 50 deg, with a threshold of about 180 GeV. ~ 70% of events and observation time of total data taken. | ||
== Low Zenith== | == Low Zenith== | ||
| − | |||
==Datacheck== | ==Datacheck== | ||
| Line 51: | Line 62: | ||
=== Data Quality Checks === | === Data Quality Checks === | ||
| − | + | Standard latest version of the data quality selection notebook. | |
| − | Standard configuration | + | Standard configuration |
Cut of max_diffuse_nsb_std = 2.3 | Cut of max_diffuse_nsb_std = 2.3 | ||
| Line 60: | Line 71: | ||
[[File:Subrun_cuts.png]] | [[File:Subrun_cuts.png]] | ||
| + | === Theta-square Plots === | ||
=== Light-curve === | === Light-curve === | ||
Revision as of 09:00, 24 July 2024
Source Name:NGC 1068
Contents
Source Parameters
Position: RA = 40.66962153 deg, Dec:-0.01329436 deg
Zenith = 29-70 deg
Cycle I
Data from /fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/YYYYMMDD/v0.10/tailcut84
MC files : dec_min_413
Energy threshold is quite high(~ 500 GeV) if I include all the data. So as balance between including as much events as possible, I am doing my analysis with a zenith cut of 50 deg, with a threshold of about 180 GeV. ~ 70% of events and observation time of total data taken.
Low Zenith
Datacheck
Verification for malfunctioning pixel clusters
20230923:[14696 14697 14698 14699]: OK Some bright pixels
20231007:[14929]: OK
20231113:[15474 15475 15476]: OK
20231116:[15615 15615 15618]: NOT SURE
20231117:[15656 15657 15658 15659]: NOT SURE some line/ ring artefacts
20231118:[15672]:NOT SURE ring artefacts
20231119:[15706]:OK
20231208:[15883 15884 15886 15887]:OK
20231209:[15917 15918 15920]:OK (little problem with one-ish pixels)
20231214:[16085 16086 16087]: OK really good
20231217:[16195 16198]: OK
20240129:[16427 16428 16429]: VERY PROBLEMATIC PIXEL CLUSTER UNFLAGGED request put in for Cat b interleaved events calibration
20240131:[16445 16446 16447 16448]: MAYBE
20240210:[16660, 16661]: MAYBE
Data Quality Checks
Standard latest version of the data quality selection notebook.
Standard configuration
Cut of max_diffuse_nsb_std = 2.3
