Difference between revisions of "NGC 1068"
Sweta.menon (talk | contribs) |
Sweta.menon (talk | contribs) (→Spectrum) |
||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
[[File:spectrum_20_50_zenith.jpg]] | [[File:spectrum_20_50_zenith.jpg]] | ||
| + | [[File:Multi_instrument_spectrum_20_50_zenith.jpg]] | ||
| + | |||
== High Zenith == | == High Zenith == | ||
Revision as of 08:22, 5 August 2024
Source Name:NGC 1068
Type Seyfert 2/ Starburst
Contents
Source Parameters
Position: RA = 40.66962153 deg, Dec:-0.01329436 deg
Zenith = 29-70 deg
Cycle I
Analysis by Sweta Menon(sweta.menon@inaf.it)
Data from /fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/YYYYMMDD/v0.10/tailcut84
MC files : dec_min_413
Energy threshold is quite high(~ 500 GeV) if I include all the data. So as balance between including as much events as possible, I am doing my analysis with a zenith cut of 50 deg, with a threshold of about 180 GeV. ~ 70% of events and observation time of total data taken.
Low Zenith
Zenith < 50 deg
Datacheck
Verification for malfunctioning pixel clusters
20230923:[14696 14697 14698 14699]: OK Some bright pixels
20231007:[14929]: OK
20231113:[15474 15475 15476]: OK
20231116:[15615 15615 15618]: OK
20231117:[15656 15657 15658 15659]: OK
20231118:[15672]:OK?
20231119:[15706]:OK
20231208:[15883 15884 15886 15887]:OK
20231209:[15917 15918 15920]:OK (little problem with one-ish pixels)
20231214:[16085 16086 16087]: OK really good
20231217:[16195 16198]: OK
20240129:[16427 16428 16429]: VERY PROBLEMATIC PIXEL CLUSTER UNFLAGGED request put in for Cat b interleaved events calibration
20240131:[16445 16446 16447 16448]: OK
20240210:[16660, 16661]: OK
Data Quality Checks
Standard latest version of the data quality selection notebook.
Standard configuration
Cut of max_diffuse_nsb_std = 2.3
Theta-square Plots
Light-curve
Spectrum
