Difference between revisions of "NGC 1068"
Sweta.menon (talk | contribs) |
Sweta.menon (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | |||
== Low Zenith== | == Low Zenith== | ||
| Line 48: | Line 49: | ||
20240210:[16660, 16661]: MAYBE | 20240210:[16660, 16661]: MAYBE | ||
| + | === Data Quality Checks === | ||
| + | |||
| + | sed latest version of the data quality selection notebook. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Standard configuration + dR/dI cosmics rate @ 422 p.e. = 1.2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cut of max_diffuse_nsb_std = 2.3 | ||
| + | [[File:Run_selection.jpg]] | ||
=== Light-curve === | === Light-curve === | ||
Revision as of 21:28, 23 July 2024
Source Name:NGC 1068
Contents
Source Parameters
Position: RA: Dec:
Observation IDs
Cycle I
Low Zenith
Datacheck
Verification for malfunctioning pixel clusters
20230923:[14696 14697 14698 14699]: OK Some bright pixels
20231007:[14929]: OK
20231113:[15474 15475 15476]: OK
20231116:[15615 15615 15618]: NOT SURE
20231117:[15656 15657 15658 15659]: NOT SURE some line/ ring artefacts
20231118:[15672]:NOT SURE ring artefacts
20231119:[15706]:OK
20231208:[15883 15884 15886 15887]:OK
20231209:[15917 15918 15920]:OK (little problem with one-ish pixels)
20231214:[16085 16086 16087]: OK really good
20231217:[16195 16198]: OK
20240129:[16427 16428 16429]: VERY PROBLEMATIC PIXEL CLUSTER UNFLAGGED request put in for Cat b interleaved events calibration
20240131:[16445 16446 16447 16448]: MAYBE
20240210:[16660, 16661]: MAYBE
Data Quality Checks
sed latest version of the data quality selection notebook.
Standard configuration + dR/dI cosmics rate @ 422 p.e. = 1.2
Cut of max_diffuse_nsb_std = 2.3
