Difference between revisions of "BLLac paper meeting"
(→collaborator meeting) |
(→collaborator meeting) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== collaborator meeting == | == collaborator meeting == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * 2022-11-01 | ||
| + | ** update (MWL analysis) [[Media:20221101_BLLac.pdf | slides ]] | ||
* 2022-06-28 | * 2022-06-28 | ||
Revision as of 11:01, 1 November 2022
collaborator meeting
- 2022-11-01
- update (MWL analysis) slides
- 2022-06-28
- short update slides
- we need to prepare spectrum plots for summer conferences. dec_3476 is used for the moment.
- the lowest energy point analyzed source-dependent analysis is weird. IRF interpolation for source-dependent was tried at the first time, so it might be wrong, under investigation
- 2022-05-12
- short update slides
- Our analysis have almost consistent results, though there are small (not large) discrepancy. It should be verified later with the final MC.
- All sky MC production is ongoing. One of dec_3476 was already partially ready on DL1/2 level.
- A new standard configuration can make the time of RF training shorter than before (1day -> 2 hours)
- a single RF using alt/az or separate of data set with corresponding poiting RF: which analysis can improve the performance? Need to check.
- NSB level of BLLac FoV is slightly higher than other egal source due to low galactic latitude. Need to check the difference on parameter distribution with/without NSB tuning. If the effect is not negligible, we need to send a request of NSB tuning also for BLLac.
- NSB tuning also can be added in R0 level
- short update slides
- 2022-04-08
- Statu update
- (Seiya) checking the data quality also based on intensity distribution. Flux level in LC is a bit lower than the previous analysis slides (Seiya)
- (Chaitanya) good observation runs are analyzed with gamma/theta efficiency cut (without intensity cut). SED on the night of flare is consistent with the Seiya's previous analysis slides (Chaitanya)
- (Gabriel) LHfit code implementation is ongoing. Crab spectrum looks more or less fine. BLLac spectrum below ~80GeV is higher than the previous analysis. Need to be checked. slides (Gabriel)
- (Juan) Flux level in LC is a bit lower than the previous analysis. More or similar as what Seiya currently obtained. To be investigated. (Juan)
- Presentation from BLLac LIV team by Cyann
- analysis of the light curve on the night of flare with different energy ranges (<~200GeV, >~200GeV). LC of the night of Aug 9 (next day of the brightest flare) will be also checked by our team
- we keep the current scheme (analysis independently), then we provide the high-level analysis product (DL3) with LIV team at some moment for the publication.
- Juan's presentation@SEA Spanish national meeting
- Green light from our side. We also need to provide DL3 products with Arnau who will present the dedicated algorithm for transient sources
- https://www.lst1.iac.es/wiki/index.php/Analysis_BLLac_Aug_2021_Aguasca-Cabot
- Next step for the LST general meeting
- Let's make a comparison plot with the same analysis conditions (basic shower parameter cut, energy range/binning for SED, LC). The detailed conditions will be announced
- Next MC production
- All sky MC for BLLac path will be ready in two weeks or so. But we also need IRF interpolation software. Anyway let's discuss later again how to proceed after the MC dataset for BLLac will be prepared.
- Statu update
- 2022-03-10 slides
- We are waiting for the MC grid production for this source, and also need to wait for interpolate-IRF software
- We will try to produce results with existing MC/data with the latest version of lstchain before the next meeting (in two weeks), then we can compare those results.
- For the selling point of this paper, we will continue to discuss with analysis results which will be produced and get comments in extragalactic meeting.
- lst1-bllac-paper slack channel is created
