Mrk 421 Preliminary Analysis with lstchain v0.9.x Priyadarshi w IRF interpolation
Contents
Mrk 421 Preliminary Analysis with lstchain v0.9.x Priyadarshi w IRF interpolation[edit]
General information[edit]
- Name of the source: Mrk 421
- Brief description of the source:
- Object type : AGN
- Redshift (z) : 0.030021
- nearly HBL
- RA: 11 04 27.314 (hh mm ss), Dec: +38 12 31.8 (dd mm ss)
- RA, Dec in deg (ICRS): 166.113808, 38.20883287
- Analysis by Chaitanya Priyadarshi (IFAE - cpriyadarshi@ifae.es)
Data-taking information[edit]
Wobble observations as mentioned in AGN_paper_LST1#Mrk_421
Monte Carlo information[edit]
For getting a closer data-MC comparison, we produce MC data along various sky positions (nodes) as a preliminary method to facilitate a better Random Forest model for the reconstruction and to interpolate IRFs from various sky positions to the target position of each Observation Run.
DL1 data[edit]
This includes whether you use LSTOSA, specific versions of lstchain, dllab scripts, cleaning levels, and calibration information.
DL1a files produced by LSTOSA (lstchain v0.9)
- original real DL1a data
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/{Date}/v0.9/tailcut84/
- lstchain v0.9 tailcut8-4 (with cleaning based on pedestal RMS, dynamical cleaning)
/fefs/aswg/data/real/DL1/20220504/v0.9/tailcut84/log/lstchain_config_v0.9.4_from2022onwards.json
- MC nodes: tailcut8-4 (with cleaning based on pedestal RMS), dynamic cleaning
/fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL1/AllSky/20220531_dec3476_std/{Testing, Training}Dataset/
Random forest[edit]
Here we use the TrainingDataset nodes, selected along the declination path (or closer to) of the selected source. The "dec3476" part in the production ID refers to the declination angle of +34.76 deg.
In this new RF model production, we include zenith and azimuth pointing parameters as well.
- lstchain v0.9.6 source-independent, dynamic cleaning
/fefs/aswg/data/models/AllSky/20220531_dec3476_std/dec_3476/
For IRF interpolation[edit]
Here we create an almost uniform grid of nodes of sky positions for TestingDataset MC, so as to facilitate IRF interpolation in the parameter space of cos zenith and the sin of angle (delta) between the geomagnetic field and the particle shower direction. IRF interpolation is performed using pyirf v0.7.
- Link to MC DL2 files used:
/fefs/aswg/data/mc/DL2/AllSky/20220531_dec3476_std/TestingDataset/dec_3476/
- Particle types: ring-wobble gamma (offset range = [0.3999, 0.4001] deg)
DL2 data[edit]
The DL2 files of the real data are stored here - /fefs/aswg/workspace/chaitanya.priyadarshi/real_data/AGN/Mrk421/v09x/tailcut84/DL2/real/src_indep/20220531_dec3476/{Date}
DL3 data selection[edit]
For energy-dependent cuts[edit]
Information about your DL3 data selection.
- intensity > 50
- r: [0, 1]
- wl: [0.01, 1]
- leakage_intensity_width_2: [0, 1]
- source-independent
- gh_efficiency: 0.8
- theta_containment: 0.8
- Energy-dependent Gammaness and Theta cut distribution
High-level analysis[edit]
- lstchain Tools to generate source-independent IRF and DL3
- Science Tool: gammapy 1.0
- point-like IRF, 1D analysis
For DL3 data reduction to DL4 dataset,
- OFF regions selected - 1 Wobble
- Safe Energy mask for systematics - Yes, 39.8 GeV < E < 40 TeV
- Energy axes -
- True: 10 GeV to 100 TeV with 5 bins per decade
- Reco: 10 GeV to 100 TeV with 5 bins per decade
For spectral analysis,
- Model used -
- Exponential Cutoff Power Law + EBL (Dominguez) (12.46 sigmas preference over Power Law + EBL)
- Reference energy used by calculating the decorrelation energy with a Power Law fit, 360.9 GeV (Full dataset)
- Spectral Fit energy range - 10 GeV to 100 TeV with 5 bins per decade
- Spectral fit with gammapy default optimization - minuit
- Seeing the LC of the full dataset, 1 period was analyzed separately:
- Date: 20220518
For LC,
- E_min = 100 Gev
Analysis Results[edit]
Cross Check with Crab Nebula[edit]
Analysis Crab Nebula Performance Paper Dataset w IRF interpolation Priyadarshi
Theta2 plot[edit]
- Single energy bin
- 5 bins per decade in energy
Significance map[edit]
Excess map[edit]
Spectral results[edit]
For energy-dependent cuts[edit]
Preliminary LC and SED
- Full Dataset
- Selected period
LC Flux Variability check[edit]
To check the LC flux variability, fluxes for low energy range (100 GeV < E < 500 GeV) and high energy range (500 GeV < E < 100 TeV) are compared. Ratio of these fluxes is called as "hardness ratio".
- Low energy LC flux vs high energy LC flux
- Hardness ratio for each data
- Hardness ratio vs low energy LC flux
LC with Bayesian Block time intervals[edit]
Using astropy's bayesian blocks to re-evaluate the time intervals to estimate the LC flux, by using the "measures" fitness function (measured sequence with Gaussian errors), and with argument, p0 = 0.05, false alarm probability to compute the prior.
- LC flux for the Bayesian Block periods overlaid with the night-wise LC flux
- LC flux for the Bayesian Block periods only
- Photon index evaluated at the reference energy vs LC of the Bayesian Block periods
- LC flux, photon index and statistical significance of the flux estimation for each time bin
SED for different Bayesian Block time intervals[edit]
Using the same reference energy as for the total dataset, the datasets are stacked together as per the Bayesian Block time intervals from the previous section, and re-run the Fit and Flux Point Estimation process for each sub-datasets. For several sub-datasets, LP+EBL or ECPL+EBL were preferred over PL+EBL with 5-6 sigmas.
- SEDs for some close Bayesian Block periods, LC for the same period are shown in the right plots